Never Visit Risk Analysis Report

Comprehensive analysis of risk factors associated with patients never having follow-up visits

Generated on August 01, 2025 at 10:06 AM

🎯 Risk Group Classifications & Rationale

This analysis examines four key risk factors that may influence patient follow-up behavior after delivery. Each risk group represents a clinically relevant category with distinct implications for care coordination:

🩺 HTN Status (Hypertension)

Risk Group: Patients with current hypertension diagnosis during pregnancy

Rationale: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy require ongoing cardiovascular monitoring and management postpartum. These patients need specialized follow-up to prevent long-term cardiovascular complications and monitor blood pressure control.

📋 HTN History Flag

Risk Group: Patients with documented history of hypertension prior to current pregnancy

Rationale: Patients with pre-existing hypertension have established cardiovascular risk requiring continuous care coordination. Their pregnancy may have exacerbated their condition, making postpartum follow-up critical for medication adjustment and long-term health management.

🏥 HTN + Comorbidities

Risk Group: Patients with hypertension plus additional medical conditions (CKD, diabetes, heart disease, etc.)

Rationale: Multiple comorbidities create complex medical needs requiring multidisciplinary care and frequent monitoring. These patients face the highest risk for complications and have the greatest need for coordinated follow-up care across multiple specialties.

⚠️ Overall Risk Stratification

Risk Groups: Low, Medium, and High risk classifications based on clinical assessment

Rationale: This composite risk score integrates multiple clinical factors to identify patients most likely to benefit from intensive follow-up interventions. Higher risk patients require more frequent monitoring and proactive outreach to prevent adverse outcomes.

📊 Clinical Significance

Understanding which risk groups are most associated with "never visits" helps healthcare systems prioritize resources and develop targeted interventions. Patients who never return for follow-up care miss opportunities for preventive care, medication management, and early detection of complications, potentially leading to more severe health outcomes and higher healthcare costs.

Executive Summary

8,776
Total Patients
4,522
Never Visit Count
51.5%
Never Visit Rate

📊 Overall Distribution Analysis

Distribution Analysis

Figure 1: Distribution of key variables in the dataset

🎯 Never Visit Rates by Risk Factors

Risk Factors Analysis

Figure 2: Never visit rates across different risk factor categories

Key Findings by Risk Factor:

Risk Factor Category Total Patients Never Visit Count Never Visit Rate
HTN Status No HTN 3,278.0 1,786.0 54.5%
HTN Status HTN 5,498.0 2,736.0 49.8%
HTN History Flag No HTN History 2,673.0 1,545.0 57.8%
HTN History Flag HTN History 6,103.0 2,977.0 48.8%
Risk Group High 201 78 38.8%
Risk Group Low 4,188 2,382 56.9%
Risk Group Medium 4,387 2,062 47.0%
HTN + Comorbidity No HTN+Comorbidity 8,161 4,295 52.6%
HTN + Comorbidity HTN+Comorbidity 615 227 36.9%

🏥 Comorbidity Impact Analysis

Comorbidity Analysis

Figure 3: Impact of comorbidities on never visit rates

📈 Statistical Significance Testing

Risk Factor Chi-square Statistic P-value Statistically Significant
HTN History Flag 60.2033 0.0000 Yes
HTN Status 18.1359 0.0000 Yes
Risk Group 96.9684 0.0000 Yes
HTN + Any Comorbidity 55.9403 0.0000 Yes

Statistical significance determined at α = 0.05 level

🎯 Key Conclusions & Clinical Recommendations

Primary Risk Factors Identified:

Recommended Actions:

This report was automatically generated from the Never Visit Risk Analysis

For questions or additional analysis, contact the Data Analytics Team